Florida’s Amendment 2 = California’s Proposition 8
by Samuel Febres
There are arguments that in Florida, this amendment isn’t necessary since there are statutes that already restrict marriage in Florida to 1 man and 1 woman.
From Florida Statute 741.212 (1):
“Marriages between persons of the same sex entered into in any jurisdiction … domestic or foreign … or relationships between persons of the same sex, which are treated as marriages in any jurisdiction, whether within or outside the State of Florida, the United States, or any other jurisdiction … or any other place or location, are not recognized for any purpose in this state.”
From Florida Statute 741.212 (2):
“The state, its agencies, and its political subdivisions may not give effect to any public act, record or judicial proceeding of any state, territory, possession, or tribe of the United States or of any other jurisdiction … domestic or foreign, or any other place or location respecting either a marriage or relationship not recognized under subsection (1) or a claim arising from such a marriage or relationship.”
From Florida Statute 741.212 (3):
“For purposes of interpreting any state statute or rule, the term ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the term ‘spouse’ applies only to a member of such a union.”And just for good measure…
Florida Statute 741.04 (1) prohibits any judge or clerk of the court from issuing a marriage license “unless one party is a male and the other party is a female.”– SayNo2.com
There are also arguments that says we need to protect the sanctity of marriage, and that marriage is and should be defined as 1 man and 1 woman, and that traditional marriage needs to be protected by poor rulings of activist judges.
What’s your take on this? Are you for or against Amendment 2? Do you consider this to be unnecessary legislation or is this something that we need to make sure ‘activist judges’ cannot mess around with?
More Information:
Comments
That's ridiculous! Why should it matter? Love is LOVE! And if you're arguing for tradition well then you need to take a look at our new President! TRADITION 50 years ago would have prevented such a thing. So as far as I'm concerned TRADITION changes and so can the ideas of TRADITIONAL marriages.
Alex…is that you?
Well either way, FUCK YES. This is all bullshit.
About the adoption; so many children don't have a father in this country. Would it be so bad then if some kids had 2 dads or 2 moms,?
And if people want to talk about marraige harming society, how about taking a look at the divorce rate among strait couples.
We do live in an imperfect world, and sadly it affects all of us making all of our lives less than ideal.
Another thing-
God? ( I am a Christian by the way) GOD has nothing to do with most marriages! Do you have any idea how many couples are married and don't even believe in the Christian God? My parents got married in a judge's office by signing papers and saying "Yes."
And the "It threatens religious freedom!" is a load of bull as well. If anything it would create more religious freedom!
I don't think that a church should have to marry two people that they don't want to, but a gay couple should be able to get married like my parents did if they so choose.
And the children thing…
How many child abusers, molestors, or drug users, or murderers or ANYONE are allowed to marry and raise children? Gay couples can raise a child just as well as any straight couple.
I think it's more of an argument for what's correct and right.